Sunday, June 26, 2016

Opiates

The epidemic of prescription opiate overdoses is a really complex issue. It's gotten a lot of press in the popular media especially as President Obama declared this a national crisis. But I'm afraid this is a much more nuanced issue than most people realize. There is no doubt that the number of emergency visits and accidental deaths from prescription opiates has skyrocketed. We are seeing less heroin, methamphetamines, and cocaine, and a lot more oxycodone and morphine. But the solution is not clear to me.

Recent guidelines strongly recommend avoiding opiate prescriptions outside of cancer pain and palliative care. In particular, there are recommendations to avoid long acting or slow release medications. Alternative pain medications including drugs normally considered for neuropathy, inflammation, and epilepsy are highly recommended. Indeed, I've read several recent research studies supporting de-escalation of opiates outside of cancer and the end-of-life.

These guidelines are quite reasonable, but for me, they highlight the difficulty in treating chronic pain. In anesthesia residency, we spend only a little time in the chronic pain clinic, but it is still more than family practitioners get. The few months I worked with pain patients taught me that treating pain is a highly specialized practice requiring advanced training. Of course, there are hardly enough pain specialists out there to care for the epidemic of chronic pain and its resultant epidemic of prescription opiates. But it does shine a light on the fact that complex patients should be referred to a pain practice.

I've met drug-seekers and malingerers, and I've also met patients with real chronic pain. In treating chronic pain, I believe (and have been taught) that long acting or slow release medications are crucial. They provide a foundation of effective pain relief in the same way that long acting insulin provides a background dose. Short acting medications help with spikes of pain in the same way that short acting insulin is given for meals or snacks. Avoiding long acting opiates can create big swings in pain management where the patient gets behind and then takes too much to catch up; it can disrupt sleep and impair function.

I definitely agree with multimodal management of pain, using non-opiate alternatives such as antiepileptic, antinflammatory, and neuropathic drugs. But in seeing patients on these complex regimens, I realize the risks of polypharmacy. It can be challenging for patients to keep track of their different medications or physicians to manage their side effects and interactions. When I read the geriatric literature, all of it suggests paring down on medications. How do we balance these conflicting recommendations?

I guess in the end, I chose not to be a pain specialist for a reason. But when I see the lay media, medical journals, and CDC recommendations on how to curb prescription drug abuse, I question how simple they make it sound. Like any other epidemic, tackling this is not easy. I hope that pain management physicians will step up to engage the public, educate physicians, and research ways of reducing overdoses and accidental deaths.

4 comments:

kim said...

I definitely agree that this requires specialty care, and wish that as a primmary provider I'd had more training in it. Unfortunately, in the community, our pain clinics aren't functioning as nuanced, individualized care. They're functioning to provide quick prescriptions to mass populations of people. It is hard to provide quality care with the conflicts of interest in terms of time and money (of course this is true of all specialties). I think there should be more emphasis on training providers on suboxone for pain; none of the pain clinics we refer to in our community are licensed in this. I've had patients who can't be evaluated for lung transplants they need due to their respiratory effort being so depressed by opiates provided by their pain clinic, and no pain clinic has ever reached out to me as a primary provider to learn more about their medical issues. When I reach out to them, they have always been unaware of the patient's global picture, which seems essential in pain management. We do have a great county pain clinic, which is overwhelmed and can no longer take patients, but in the community there's little regulation. It would be great to hear your thoughts on how it can be improved as a speciality, because you make a great point that it's not so black and white, and needs to be evaluated on an individual basis.

Craig said...

really really great comments...thank you! one thing you said really resonates with me...that pain management (along with every other medical specialty) needs to keep a global view of the patient. a pain specialist needs to know about a patient's pulmonary issues and that they could be evaluated for transplant. they should not be just "prescription mills" - which is all too common in some areas (and as you pointed out, lucrative).

i come from a training program with an outstanding pain program and so i'm greatly influenced by seeing things the way they ought to be. our chronic pain patients get a multidisciplinary evaluation with a psychologist, physical therapist, and physician; both fellows and attendings come from many backgrounds...neurology, psychiatry, anesthesiology, and PM&R. We emphasize a complex approach to pain management including physical therapy, medications, interventions, psychological/behavioral therapy. We have a large grant researching the place of complementary and alternative therapies. The problem with such a system is that we can't evaluate all the patients who need to be seen since we take such a detailed approach. but this is the ideal evaluation of a patient looking for opiates. we need to spend time to understand them as a person, how pain defines them, how to approach the treatment of that pain without simply writing a prescription.

as you mentioned, therapies like suboxone which limit abuse potential can be extremely effective, but federal regulations require providers to be highly trained in its use. expanding the use of those therapies can also help curb the opiate epidemic

kim said...

Yes! I love that your program is so holistic, and find that academic centers are often best for this type of thing. It's been a little jarring to go from an academic center to the community, but am grateful for having a model for how things "ought to be."

It's interesting re: federal regulations for suboxone--it takes just a short course to get a license (though in practice, this prevents a real barrier) so I have mine now but still feel generally unequipped to think about pain from all the perspectives you mention. I hope this becomes a focus in both generalist and specialist training in the future.

Thanks for all your insights and care!

Craig said...

Thanks for the reply. It's true - there's a disconnect between the ivory tower and the realistic and practical ways medicine is practiced. I'm glad to hear you are licensed for suboxone - I also believe I read several months ago that the FDA expanded the number of patients suboxone providers can treat from 100 to 250, so that's a step in the right direction.

The other thought I had about the pain epidemic is that I've heard some practitioners feel pressured to prescribe opiates in order to get better patient satisfaction scores. I don't know if this is really the case, but I worry that it is a scenario where a well-meaning intervention like surveying patients for how well their pain was treated leads to dangerous consequences.

Thank you again for your thoughtful comments